Jeremy Goldstein Puts the Rumors to Rest, Shares His Compromise for Fixing EPS

What exactly is “Earnings per Share,” and why has it garnered so much flak in recent days? EPS is a method of employee compensation based on a pay-per-performance model. It encourages employees to focus on company success and helps to bring up stock prices significantly. It has been proven to bring companies closer to success and is universally praised for its advantages. But in some cases, EPS can quickly become a disadvantage. Jeremy Goldstein offers insight into those cases, as well as suggestions on how to prevent them.



Can EPS be Fixed?

The advantages of EPS can’t be overstated when it’s used correctly, but sometimes, executives and CEOs can take advantage of EPS for their own benefit at the cost of the company. This possibility has earned it a lot of flak from critics. While manipulation of metrics and the misleading of shareholders is by no means commonplace, it’s still a very real possibility and has been abused before. On top of issues already present with EPS regarding stability and value fluctuation, this has made EPS increasingly unappealing. But that doesn’t mean that it can’t be salvaged, and, in many cases, it’s still of incredible benefit to the company.


So how can EPS be used without risking the company’s well-being? Jeremy Goldstein believes that the best way to do this is to hold the higher-ups accountable for abusing the system. When they can no longer safely use it to gain short-term cash for themselves, they will have to focus on long-term profitability and the continued success of the company. This encourages company growth, as well as a steady rise in the value of shares.



Jeremy Goldstein

Based in New York at his boutique law firm, Jeremy L. Goldstein & Associates, LLC, Goldstein is an expert in compensation and business law. He has served a number of prestigious clients throughout the United States and is considered one of the country’s top lawyers by both the Legal 500 and the Chambers USA Guide to America’s Leading Lawyers for Business. His years of experience lend him the unique perspective necessary to solve the foremost problems in the world of business law.


In addition to his professional ventures, Goldstein has worked with a number of law journals such as the NYU Journal of Law and Business. His perspective on the most pressing legal issues of the modern day provides unrivaled insight into the world of business law. He has also donated significant sums to charities which are dedicated to the treatment of mental illness, foremost among them being Fountain House. Learn more:


The Responsibilities of Litigators Like Karl Heideck in the Administration of Justice

Karl Heideck helps his clients fully understand the litigation process.
Attorney Karl Heideck will walk you through the entire litigation process.

A litigator, also known as a trial lawyer is an advocate who represents the complainants and the defendants in civil cases. Anyone who aspires to become a litigator must have bachelor’s degree in law from an accredited law school, and pass the bar exam.

In addition, the person must also have knowledge of legal research, legal software’s, excellent communication skills, critical thinking, and attention to details, honesty, and responsibility among other key skills. Litigation is a very diverse process which involves various phases like case investigation, pleading, discovery, pre-trial, trial, settlement, and appeal. Below is a summary of this processes.

Initial case investigation/Assessment: the trial lawyer conducts a preliminary investigation in order to determine whether there is enough evidence on the complainants’ side to file a lawsuit or what evidence exist on the defendant’s case to defend a possible lawsuit.

Discovery: this phase involves the exchange of relevant information between the parties. The litigator employs various methods to access information relevant to the lawsuit.

Pre-trial: this happens a week to the trial. The litigator finalizes the discovery process and prepares for the final trial. The litigator consults with and gives directions to his clients, preserve expert witness, and develop a trial strategy based on the collected facts and evidence.

Trial: in this stage, the litigator selects a judge or a jury and presents the case in court. The trial lawyer also presents the opening and the closing statements, examine and cross-examine witnesses, and compose an interesting story for the judge through testimony and evidence.

Settlement: most cases are settled long before they reach the trial stage. The litigator may settle a case anytime during the litigation phases. The litigator meditates between the conflicting parties to find a solution.

Appeal: if any party is dissatisfied with the outcome of the trial ruling, they may file an appeal. During an appeal, the dissatisfied party as a higher court to evaluate the trial court proceedings. Under normal situations, the appeal courts only review a case for legal errors only and do not interfere with the evidence.

Karl Heideck is a well-established lawyer with key skills in risk management and compliance practices. Karl Heideck possesses additional skills in the field of legal writing, legal research, product liability, commercial litigation, corporate law, and employment law. Karl Heideck has been practicing law for more than 10 years and resides in Philadelphia Area.

Karl Heideck initially studied English and literature at Swarthmore College and then later enrolled at the Temple University Beasley School of Law where he graduated with honors.